Compare Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Toyota Camry Solara Convertible
Variants
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2.2
3.0 198
3.0 200
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
249 L / 8.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
1400 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Width
1806 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
54%
Pros
- Improved styling
- Better build quality
- Fully independent suspensions
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good interior and exterior finish
Cons
- Tiny inline-4 engine
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Lethargic handling
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.