Compare Ford Mustang 5 Convertible vs Volvo C70 Convertible
Variants
Mustang
Mustang GT 304
Mustang GT 324
Mustang GT 324 AT
Mustang GT 500 507
Mustang GT 500 558
Mustang GT 500 672
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
275 L / 9.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
Track Width | Front
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
73%
28%
Pros
- Great V8 choices
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Improved sporty styling
- Characterful I5 engines
- No diesel nonsense
- Reliable drivetrain
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly with the top up and down
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.