Compare Chrysler Sebring 2 Convertible vs Volvo C70 Convertible
Variants
2.0
2.4
2.7
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Length
4920 mm / 193.7 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
ECC
Reviews
Neofiliac score
39%
28%
Pros
- True convertible
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Characterful I5 engines
- No diesel nonsense
- Reliable drivetrain
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor interior quality
- Ugly with the top up and down
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.