Compare Nissan 350Z vs Nissan 370Z
Variants
283
300 AT
313
313 AT
300
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
235 L / 8.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
65%
81%
Pros
- Good drivetrain setup
- Good handling characteristics
- Good handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Some reliability concerns
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor interior finish
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.