Compare Nissan Altima 4 Coupe vs Hyundai Elantra 5 Coupe

Variants
2.5
3.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
454 L / 16.0 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/55 R17
205/55 R16, 215/45 R17

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1405 mm / 55.3 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4539 mm / 178.7 in
Size | Width
1796 mm / 70.7 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Weight
1238.0 kg / 2729.3 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.4 L/100km / 31.8 MPG (combined) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (urban) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2012
2012 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
18%
Pros
  • Reliable engines
  • Decent exterior and interior finish
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • CVT
  • Impractical
  • Awkward styling
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.