Compare Chevrolet Corvette C6 vs Bentley Continental R
Variants
LS2
LS2 AT
LS3
LS3 AT
Z06
ZR1
Continental R
Continental R Mulliner
Continental T
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
9.4 L / 9.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Trailing arm
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
104.1 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
Engine | Displacement
6.8 L / 411.9 cu-in / 6750.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
99.1 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
91%
Pros
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Excellent power output
- Manual transmission widely available
- Great styling
- Double-wishbone suspensions all around
- Ultimate elegant
- Superb engine character
- Wonderful fit and finish
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Not reliable
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.