Compare Chevrolet Cobalt Coupe vs Hyundai Elantra 5 Coupe

Variants
2.0
2.2
2.4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
394 L / 13.9 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/45 R17

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1415 mm / 55.7 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4580 mm / 180.3 in
4539 mm / 178.7 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Weight
1238.0 kg / 2729.3 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2624 mm / 103.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.9 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.4 L/100km / 31.8 MPG (combined) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (urban) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
225.0 km/h / 139.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2010
2012 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
18%
Pros
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Interesting supercharged engine
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible reliability record
  • Awkward styling
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.