Compare Nissan X-Trail vs Nissan Pathfinder 5

Variants
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.0 Euro4 AWD
2.0 AWD AT
2.2 dCi 114 AWD
2.2 dCi 136
2.2 dCi 136 AWD
2.5 AWD
2.5 AWD AT
AWD
FWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1841 L / 65.0 cu-ft
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft ~ 2280 L / 80.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 350x30 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 330x16 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.1 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.6 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
180 mm / 7.1 in
Size | Height
1675 mm / 65.9 in
1796 mm / 70.7 in
Size | Length
5022 mm / 197.7 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1979 mm / 77.9 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1699.0 mm / 66.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1699.0 mm / 66.9 in
Wheelbase
2625 mm / 103.3 in
2901 mm / 114.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.324
Towing Capacity
2722 kg / 6001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Tier3 Bin70/LEV3-ULEV70
Engine
VQ35DD
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
284.0 hp / 211.8 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
81.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
351 Nm / 258.9 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
65%
Pros
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Naturally-aspirated V6 engine
  • Good interior comfort
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Uncomfortable
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor fit and finish
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.