Compare Hyundai Kona vs Audi Q3 facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
1.4 TFSI 125
1.4 TFSI 150 DCT
1.4 TFSI 150
2.0 TDI 120
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 150 quattro DCT
2.0 TDI 184 quattro
2.0 TDI 184 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 180 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 220 quattro DCT
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2603 mm / 102.5 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
Kappa
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
33%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Relatively reliable engines
- Some towing capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
- Questionable exterior styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.