Compare Mazda CX-9 vs Mazda CX-8
Variants
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+
2.2d 4WD
2.2d
2.5
2.5T 4WD
2.5T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
487 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 2852 L / 100.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
7
Payload
671 kg / 1479 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Size | Length
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1840 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Wheelbase
2875 mm / 113.2 in
2930 mm / 115.4 in
Performance
Top Speed
192.0 km/h / 119.3 mph
Powertrain
Engine
Ford Durtec 35
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
65%
32%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Good reliability
- Good interior space
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bland styling
- Not built for drivers
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.