Compare Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-9
Variants
2.0 160 AWD
2.0 160 AWD AT
2.0 165
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD AT
2.0 165 Euro6
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AWD
2.2D 150 AWD AT
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 175 AWD
2.2D 175 AWD AT
2.5 192 AWD AT
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
503 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1620 L / 57.2 cu-ft
487 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 2852 L / 100.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
7
Payload
671 kg / 1479 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm, Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1710 mm / 67.3 in
Size | Length
4555 mm / 179.3 in
Track Width | Front
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
Wheelbase
2875 mm / 113.2 in
Performance
Top Speed
192.0 km/h / 119.3 mph
Powertrain
Engine
Ford Durtec 35
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
65%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.