Compare Mazda CX-7 vs Mazda CX-5 II

Variants
2.2D
2.3 Turbo AWD AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo
2.3 DiSi Turbo AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo AWD AT
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AT
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AWD
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AWD AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AWD
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AWD AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AWD
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 187 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 194 AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 194 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G AWD AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
69.0 L / 18.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Size | Length
4575 mm / 180.1 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Powertrain

Engine | Stroke
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
36%
40%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Good fuel efficiency
  • Good engine lineup
  • Decent build quality
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.