Compare Opel Antara vs Opel Grandland X
Variants
2.0 CDTI 127
2.2 CDTI 163 AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184
2.2 CDTI 184 AT
2.4 167 AWD
2.4 167 AWD AT
2.4 167
2.4 167 AT
2.4 150
2.4 150 AT
3.2 227
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130 AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 130
1.5d 130 AT
1.6 Turbo 180 AT
1.6 Turbo 224 PHEV
1.6 Turbo 300 PHEV AWD
1.6d 120
1.6d 120 AT
2.0d 177 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
14.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Semi-independent
Tire Size
225/70 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross) | 11.5 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
188 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Height
1609 mm / 63.3 in
Size | Length
4477 mm / 176.3 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2707 mm / 106.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Reviews
Neofiliac score
19%
18%
Pros
- Not the worst vehicle on the market
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.