Compare Subaru B9 Tribeca vs Subaru Crosstrek
Variants
1.6 CVT
1.6 MT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.0DL
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
1270 L / 44.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 312 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 315 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.1 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, spring
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
255/55 R18 104H
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
213 mm / 8.4 in
Size | Height
1687 mm / 66.4 in
Size | Length
4821 mm / 189.8 in
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Weight
1885.0 kg / 4155.7 lbs
Wheel Size
8J x 18
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2748 mm / 108.2 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Fuel Economy
13.1 L/100km / 18.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
907 kg / 2000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine
EZ30
Engine | Bore
89.2 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 183.0 cu-in / 2999.0 cc
Engine | Power
250.0 hp / 186.4 kW @ 6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
83.4 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Torque
297 Nm / 219.1 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SPORTSHIFT
Manual
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2007
2012 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
52%
33%
Pros
- Good offroad capabilities for a crossover
- Interesting H6 engine
- Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
- Rather ugly front end
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.