Compare Toyota Yaris 3 vs Honda Fit 4
Variants
1.0
1.33
1.33 Euro6
1.33 Euro6 CVT
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D Euro6
1.4 D-4D
1.4
Hybrid Euro6
1.5
1.5 CVT
Hybrid
GRMN
1.3 AWD
1.3
1.5 e:HEV
1.5 e:HEV AWD
Crosstar 1.3 AWD
Crosstar 1.3 CVT
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV AWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Dimensions
Size | Height
1510 mm / 59.4 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Wheelbase
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
17%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Still has I4 engines
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.