Compare Citroen C2 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo
Variants
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Length
3666 mm / 144.3 in
Size | Width
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2315 mm / 91.1 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
3%
25%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Easy to drive and park
- Low official fuel consumption
- Beautiful design
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Very tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.