Compare Mazda 2 II vs Alfa Romeo MiTo

Variants
1.3 75
1.3 75 Euro5
1.3 84
1.3 86
1.4 CD
1.5 102
1.5 102 AT
1.5 103
1.5 103 AT
1.6 CD 90
1.6 CD 95
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2490 mm / 98.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
25%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.