Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Alfa Romeo MiTo
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
23%
25%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Beautiful design
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- More emission control systems to fail
- No powerful engine options
- Very tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.