Compare Ford Mondeo 4 vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan
Variants
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 125hp
1.6T 150hp
1.6T 182hp
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp start/stop
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp start/stop
1.6T AT
2.0D 140hp
2.0D 140hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Track Width | Front
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Torque
170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
8%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Cute exterior design
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Questionable automatic transmission
- NVH issues
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.