Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Volkswagen Golf 8 vs Peugeot 308 III

Hyundai i30 III (PD) facelift Hatchback (2020)

Hyundai Motor | Cars

Volkswagen | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0 T-GDi

1.0 T-GDi DCT

1.5 DPi

1.5 T-GDi

1.5 T-GDi DCT

1.6 CRDi 115

1.6 CRDi 115 DCT

1.6 CRDi 136

1.6 CRDi 136 DCT

i30 N Performance

i30 N Performance DCT

1.0 eTSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 90

1.4 TSI 204 eHybrid DSG

1.5 eTSI 130 DSG

1.5 eTSI 150 DSG

1.5 TGI 130 DSG

1.5 TSI 130

1.5 TSI 150

2.0 TDI 115

2.0 TDI 150

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

GTD DSG

GTE DSG

GTI

GTI Clubsport DSG

GTI DSG

R 4MOTION DSG

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc, 345 mm

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc, 314 mm

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Torsion

Tire Size

235/35 R19 Y

Turning Circle

11.7 m / 38.2 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Length

4340 mm / 170.9 in

4367 mm / 171.9 in

Size | Width

1795 mm / 70.7 in

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

Wheel Size

8.0J x 19

Wheelbase

2650 mm / 104.3 in

2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

34.6 m / 113.5 ft

Coefficient Of Drag

0.275

0.28

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

EB2DTS

Engine | Bore

86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

9.5:1

10.5:1

Engine | Stroke

86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Production

Availability

2020

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

32%

70%

26%

Pros

Decent build quality
Decent performance
Good handling

Rather good styling
Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Good handlding characteristics

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.