Compare Jeep Cherokee KL vs Chevrolet Equinox 3

Variants
2.0 272 AT
2.0 272 AWD AT
2.0 Multijet II 140
2.0 Multijet II 140 AWD
2.0 Multijet II 170 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 185 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.4 177 AT
2.4 177 AWD AT
2.4 180 AT
2.4 180 AWD AT
3.2 271 AT
3.2 272 AWD AT
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Wheelbase
2725 mm / 107.3 in

Powertrain

Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
19%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Cheap to purchase
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Disgrace to the Cherokee name
  • Ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.