Compare Jeep Cherokee KL vs Fiat 500X facelift
Variants
2.0 272 AT
2.0 272 AWD AT
2.0 Multijet II 140
2.0 Multijet II 140 AWD
2.0 Multijet II 170 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 185 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.4 177 AT
2.4 177 AWD AT
2.4 180 AT
2.4 180 AWD AT
3.2 271 AT
3.2 272 AWD AT
1.0 FireFly Turbo 120
1.3 FireFly Turbo 150
1.3 MultiJet II 95
1.3 Turbo 177 AWD AT
1.6 e TorQ 110
1.6 MultiJet II 120
1.6 MultiJet II 120 DCT
2.0 MultiJet II 150 AWD AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/60 R17, 225/55 R18
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Towing Capacity
907 kg / 2000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
8%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Poor performance
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Disgrace to the Cherokee name
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Poor offroad capabilities for an SUV
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Ugliest Italian car widely available
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.