Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs BMW X2 F39

Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
15.0 kWh (gross)
10.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
295.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
4360 mm / 171.7 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
57.0 km / 35.4 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
35%
34%
Pros
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.