Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2 facelift
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.4 TSI eHybrid DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 245 4MOTION DSG
Tiguan R
1.5 TSI 150 DSG R-Line
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG R-Line
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross) | 10.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
Performance
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
59.0 km / 36.7 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
27%
19%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent engines
- Down to very low 1.8L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.