Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs BMW X6 G06 vs BMW X5 E53

Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
M50d
M50i
xDrive30d
xDrive30d MHEV
xDrive40d
xDrive40i
xDrive40i MHEV
3.0d
3.0d AT
3.0i
3.0i AT
4.4i AT
4.6is AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
580 L / 20.5 cu-ft ~ 1530 L / 54.0 cu-ft
465 L / 16.4 cu-ft ~ 1550 L / 54.7 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 332 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Disc, 324 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
25.1 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1696 mm / 66.8 in
1717 mm / 67.6 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4935 mm / 194.3 in
4666 mm / 183.7 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1872 mm / 73.7 in
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1678.0 mm / 66.1 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in

Performance

Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Offroad
500 mm Max Water Fording

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Availability
2020
2000 ~ 2003
Debut
2019-07-03
Made In
USA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
73%
40%
Pros
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Interesting engine options
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Some utility offered
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Lack practicality
  • Quite ugly on the outside
  • Unreliable transmission

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.