Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Volvo XC40 vs Chevrolet Bolt EUV

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
462 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1611 L / 56.9 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc, 264 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring, Torsion
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1616 mm / 63.6 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4306 mm / 169.5 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Weight
1669.0 kg / 3679.5 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
250 miles (402 km)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-14

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
32%
13%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good for postering
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Ridiculous form factor
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.