Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Honda HR-V 2 vs Honda Pilot 2
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp AT
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d CVT
1.5 i-VTEC Hybrid
1.5 VTEC Turbo
1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT
1.6 i-DTEC
1.6 i-DTEC Euro6d
1.8 i-VTEC
1.8 i-VTEC AWD CVT
1.8 i-VTEC CVT
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
79.0 L / 20.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
8
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs, 330 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc, 333 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35Z4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
18%
34%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Low official fuel consumption
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- High engine reliability
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Quite ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.