Compare BMW X5 G05 vs Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Range Rover Evoque Coupe
Variants
xDrive25d
xDrive30d
xDrive30d 7 Seat
xDrive30d MHEV
xDrive40d
xDrive40i MHEV
xDrive40i
xDrive40i 7 Seat
xDrive45e
xDrive50i
M50d
M50d 7 Seat
M50i
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
Si4 285PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS 4WD 6AT
SD4 190PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
25.2 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Body Style
3-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
214 mm / 8.4 in
215 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1745 mm / 68.7 in
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4922 mm / 193.8 in
4797 mm / 188.9 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1629.0 mm / 64.1 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Electric Range
86.0 km / 53.4 mi
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
67%
8%
Pros
- Good performance
- Beautiful styling
- Some offroad capabilities
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- So ugly that many thought it had character
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Reliability concerns
- Crossover nonsense
- Very tight inside
- Low cargo capacity
- Bad drivetrain
- MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad ZF 9HP transmission
- Pretends to be "SUV"
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.