Compare Infiniti QX70 vs Honda CR-V 5 vs Infiniti QX50 II

Variants
3.0D
3.7
5.0
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
AWD
FWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft
895 L / 31.6 cu-ft ~ 1699 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 255/45 R20
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
218 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1680 mm / 66.1 in
1679 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4865 mm / 191.5 in
4693 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
2134 mm / 84.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1903 mm / 74.9 in
Track Width | Front
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 19, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2885 mm / 113.6 in
2800 mm / 110.2 in

Performance

Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
1361 kg / 3000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.2 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
XTRONIC

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2017
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
77%
41%
53%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Interesting V8 option
  • RWD platform
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Good interior design
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible CVT
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No longer RWD-based
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.