Compare Infiniti QX50 II vs Honda CR-V 5 vs Honda Pilot 2
Variants
AWD
FWD
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
895 L / 31.6 cu-ft ~ 1699 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
79.0 L / 20.9 gal
Passengers
5
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 330 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 333 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 255/45 R20
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
218 mm / 8.6 in
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1679 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4693 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
1903 mm / 74.9 in
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 19, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2800 mm / 110.2 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
1361 kg / 3000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35Z4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 5600 rpm
253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm
Engine | Redline
6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.2 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
XTRONIC
Automatic
Production
Availability
2017
2008 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
41%
34%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good interior design
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good engine reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- High engine reliability
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No longer RWD-based
- CVT
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible CVT
- Quite ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.