Compare Opel Mokka B vs Citroen C4 III
Variants
1.2 Turbo 100
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 AT
1.5 Diesel
Mokka-e
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 HDi 110
1.5 HDi 130 AT
e-C4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross)
50.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Size | Length
4151 mm / 163.4 in
Size | Width
1791 mm / 70.5 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1834 mm / 72.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1548.0 mm / 60.9 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
10%
15%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Ugly
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- EV nonsense
- Only available with tiny engines
- Horrible performance
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.