Compare Ford C-MAX 2 vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
216d
216d DCT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i Euro6d
218i Euro6d AT
218i
218i DCT
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i Euro6d AT
220i DCT
225i xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d-TEMP xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
1.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4354 mm / 171.4 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
24%
33%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside for its size
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.