Compare Mercedes C-Class Estate S206 vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Peugeot 308 SW III
Variants
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 AT
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 300d AT
C 300e AT
C 300 4MATIC AT
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
14.3 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Construction
Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
97 mm / 3.8 in
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4751 mm / 187.0 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2732 mm / 107.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.277
Electric Range
95.0 km / 59.0 mi
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Transmission | Gears
9
Transmission | Type
Automatic 9G-TRONIC
Production
Availability
2021
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
36%
31%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Great styling
- Good suspension setup
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.