Compare Mercedes C-Class Estate S206 vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Toyota Corolla Touring Sports E210

Variants
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 AT
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 300d AT
C 300e AT
C 300 4MATIC AT
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.2 Turbo
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
14.3 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
97 mm / 3.8 in
142 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4751 mm / 187.0 in
4650 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1790 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Electric Range
95.0 km / 59.0 mi
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
9
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic 9G-TRONIC

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
36%
60%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great styling
  • Good suspension setup
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Superb styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Exceptional reliability
  • Independent suspensions
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.