Compare BMW 3 Series Touring G21 vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Peugeot 308 SW III

BMW 3 Series Touring G21 Station Wagon (2019)

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) Combi Station Wagon (2019)

Peugeot 308 SW III (P5) Station Wagon (2021)

BMW | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

318d

318d AT

318i AT

320d

320d AT

320d xDrive AT

320e AT

320e xDrive AT

320i AT

330d AT

330d xDrive AT

330d MHEV AT

330d MHEV xDrive AT

330e AT

330e xDrive AT

330i AT

330i xDrive AT

M340d xDrive AT

M340i xDrive AT

1.0 TSI

1.0 TSI DSG

1.4 PHEV 204 DSG

1.5 TSI 130

1.5 TSI 130 DSG

1.5 TSI 150

1.5 TSI 150 DSG

2.0 TDI 116

2.0 TDI 116 DSG

2.0 TDI 150

2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG

2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225

Capacity

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

14.3 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

13.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.0 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

142 mm / 5.6 in

Size | Height

1444 mm / 56.9 in

Size | Length

4636 mm / 182.5 in

Size | Width

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

Wheelbase

2851 mm / 112.2 in

2732 mm / 107.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.277

Electric Range

70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

75%

36%

31%

Pros

Good performance
Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Highly competitive in its class
Improved suspension setup

Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Complex emission control systems

Ugly
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.