HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volkswagen Up facelift vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Toyota Aygo 2

Variants
1.0 60
1.0 60 ASG
1.0 75
1.0 75 ASG
1.0 75 Euro6d
1.0 EcoFuel 68
1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d
1.0 MPI 65
1.0 TSI 90
1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d
GTI
GTI Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
Pre-facelift Automatic
Pre-facelift Manual

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
168 L / 5.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
2.8 L / 3.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
144 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
3600 mm / 141.7 in
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Front
1412.0 mm / 55.6 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Weight
860.0 kg / 1896.0 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in, 15 in
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in

Performance

Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
1.0 L / 60.9 cu-in / 998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
7%
17%
18%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • Cute exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.