Compare Lexus CT 200h facelift vs Toyota Matrix E130 vs Lexus CT 200h

Variants
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS
Euro6
Euro5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
424 kg / 935 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/45 R17
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon
5-door hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4351 mm / 171.3 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1420.0 kg / 3130.6 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
16 in
Wheelbase
2601 mm / 102.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
9.8 sec
CO2 Emission
101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.29
Fuel Economy
4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (combined) | 4.7 L/100km / 50.0 MPG (urban) | 4.1 L/100km / 57.4 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
2ZR-FXE
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
98.0 hp / 73.1 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
54.5 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
142 Nm / 104.7 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT

Production

Availability
2017
2002 ~ 2007

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
16%
31%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable engines
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible to drive
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.