Compare Chevrolet Blazer vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
2.0T
2.5
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Passengers
5 / 7
Payload
944 kg / 2081 lbs
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
188 mm / 7.4 in
Wheelbase
2863 mm / 112.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
China VI B
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
33%
45%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- High cargo capacity
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Poor performance
- Mediocre build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.