Compare Honda Clarity vs Hyundai Sonata 7 LF vs Hyundai Sonata 8
Variants
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
1.6 T-GDi Eco
2.0 GDi Hybrid
2.0 GDi PHEV
2.0 T-GDi
2.4 GDi
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Vented 12"
Brakes | Rear
solid 11.2"
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
36.1 ft
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4855 mm / 191.1 in
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1865 mm / 73.4 in
1859 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
Engine | Type
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
6-speed
6- or 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
50%
34%
37%
Pros
- Distinct styling
- Fuel cell
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Much more mature styling
- No longer underpowered
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Decent performance
- Decent exterior styling
Cons
- Not meant for volume production
- Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.