Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Peugeot 508 II vs Toyota Avalon 5

Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
1.6 PSE AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4750 mm / 187.0 in
4976 mm / 195.9 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
0.27
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed or CVT
Transmission | Type
Automatic or hybrid (eCVT)

Production

Availability
2020
2018
Debut
2018 NAIAS
Made In
USA, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
64%
42%
46%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Improved interior quality
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Handsome styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior space
  • Exceptional reliability
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Short full-electric range
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.