Compare Toyota Camry Solara Convertible vs Volvo C70 II
Variants
2.2
3.0 198
3.0 200
2.0D
2.0D AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.4D
D5
D5 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 230 AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
249 L / 8.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1400 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Width
1806 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Reviews
Neofiliac score
54%
29%
Pros
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good interior and exterior finish
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Cheap on the used market
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Lethargic handling
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Diesel in a convertible
- Complicated top mechanism
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.