Compare Chrysler Sebring 2 Convertible vs Chrysler 200 Convertible
Variants
2.0
2.4
2.7
2.4
3.6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4920 mm / 193.7 in
4947 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
ECC
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
39%
45%
Pros
- True convertible
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Better styled than the Sebring
- Decent drivetrain
- Good comfort
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor interior quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad handling
- Quite front-heavy
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.