Compare Chrysler Prowler vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
50 L / 1.8 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
225/45 R17, 295/40 R20
195/65 R15
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1295 mm / 51.0 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4200 mm / 165.4 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1945 mm / 76.6 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1290.0 kg / 2844.0 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2880 mm / 113.4 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Power
257.0 hp / 191.6 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
73.1 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
346 Nm / 255.2 lb-ft @ 3950 rpm
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
1997 ~ 2002
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
23%
Pros
- Unique retro styling
- Well balanced
- Good handling
- OK-looking with the top down
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- Not a real performance machine
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.