Compare Jaguar F-Type Convertible vs Ford Mustang 4 Convertible
Variants
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
3.8 147
3.8 190
3.8 GT 152
4.6 Cobra R
4.6 Cobra
4.6 GT 215
4.6 GT 228
4.6 GT 263
5.0 GT
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Solid axle
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2622 mm / 103.2 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
69%
Pros
- Good performance
- Great styling
- Great handling
- Good reliability record
Cons
- Loss of elegance compared to the XK
- Basic suspension setup
- Low cargo capacity
- Down on power
- Inefficient
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.