Compare Alfa Romeo Spider 916 vs Alfa Romeo 4C Spider
Variants
1.8 T. Spark
2.0 JTS
2.0 T. Spark 150 Euro3
2.0 T. Spark 150
2.0 T. Spark 155
2.0 V6 TB
3.0 V6 192
3.0 V6 218
3.2 V6 240
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
110 L / 3.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
MacPherson
Tire Size
205/45 R17, 235/40 R18
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
113 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Height
1183 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Length
3989 mm / 157.0 in
Size | Width
1864 mm / 73.4 in
Track Width | Front
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Weight
940.0 kg / 2072.3 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2380 mm / 93.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.3 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
CO2 Emission
161 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
0.341
Fuel Economy
6.9 L/100km / 34.1 MPG (combined) | 10.1 L/100km / 23.3 MPG (urban) | 5.1 L/100km / 46.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
257.0 km/h / 159.7 mph
Towing Capacity
1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
Engine | Power
240.0 hp / 179.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
137.8 hp/L / 2.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic TCT
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
23%
76%
Pros
- Decent engine offerings
- Decent driving dynamics
- Great handling characteristics
- Overall good styling
Cons
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very little cargo space
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Very little cargo space
- Concerns over reliability
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.