Compare Volvo C70 II vs Toyota Camry Solara 2 Convertible
Variants
2.0D
2.0D AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.4D
D5
D5 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 230 AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230
2.4
3.3 5AT
3.3 4AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1425 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4890 mm / 192.5 in
Size | Width
1816 mm / 71.5 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
58%
Pros
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Cheap on the used market
- Great reliability
- Good interior and exterior finish
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Diesel in a convertible
- Complicated top mechanism
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.