Compare Volvo C70 II vs Chrysler Sebring 2 Convertible
Variants
2.0D
2.0D AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.4D
D5
D5 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 230 AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230
2.0
2.4
2.7
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Length
4920 mm / 193.7 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
ECC
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
39%
Pros
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Cheap on the used market
- True convertible
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Diesel in a convertible
- Complicated top mechanism
- Slow and sluggish
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor interior quality
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.