Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe
Variants
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC

Reviews

Neofiliac score72%70%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Robust engine lineup
  • Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
  • CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • AWD nonsense
  • Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
  • Less durable engines
  • Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.