Compare Audi R8 42 facelift vs BMW M6 E63 Coupe
Variants
4.2 FSI
4.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI
5.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI V10 plus
5.2 FSI V10 plus DCT
M6 SMG
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19, 295/30 R19
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1252 mm / 49.3 in
Size | Length
4440 mm / 174.8 in
4871 mm / 191.8 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Weight
1710.0 kg / 3769.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2781 mm / 109.5 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.4 sec
CO2 Emission
342 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
S85B50
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
12.0:1
Engine | Displacement
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 4999.0 cc
Engine | Power
507.0 hp / 378.1 kW @ 7750 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
101.4 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
75.2 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Torque
520 Nm / 383.5 lb-ft @ 6100 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V10 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
78%
Pros
- Improved V10 engine
- New DCT transmission
- Good handling
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Superb, characterful V10 engine
- Beautiful exterior styling
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- Horrible engine durability
- Bad SMG transmission
- Very high fuel consumption
- MacPherson front suspension
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.