Compare Audi R8 42 vs BMW M6 E63 Coupe

Variants
4.2 FSI 420
4.2 FSI 420 AMT
4.2 FSI 430
4.2 FSI 430 AMT
5.2 FSI 525
5.2 FSI 525 AMT
GT AMT
M6 SMG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1252 mm / 49.3 in
Size | Length
4871 mm / 191.8 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Weight
1710.0 kg / 3769.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2781 mm / 109.5 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.4 sec
CO2 Emission
342 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
S85B50
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
12.0:1
Engine | Displacement
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 4999.0 cc
Engine | Power
507.0 hp / 378.1 kW @ 7750 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
101.4 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
75.2 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Torque
520 Nm / 383.5 lb-ft @ 6100 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V10 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
86%
78%
Pros
  • Wonderful dry sump engines
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Manual transmission
  • Superb, characterful V10 engine
  • Beautiful exterior styling
Cons
  • AWD-only
  • Automated manual transmission
  • Awkward styling from some angles
  • Horrible engine durability
  • Bad SMG transmission
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • MacPherson front suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.